Chihiro Kuroda

If we use the postmodern premise of the "impossibility of empathy", then "understanding" between humans is a bias. It can also be understood as being too much, i.e., words are not taken in their original meaning. I am interested in such discrepancies in communication, and I use symbolic motifs to gi...

If we use the postmodern premise of the "impossibility of empathy", then "understanding" between humans is a bias. It can also be understood as being too much, i.e., words are not taken in their original meaning. I am interested in such discrepancies in communication, and I use symbolic motifs to give a wide scope to interpretation. How does this change our understanding of each other? When the identity of "face" is removed, the "someone" becomes a kind of symbol.

When the identity of "face" is removed, the "someone" becomes a kind of sign - subjectivity. By symbolically representing the image of the "someone" interpretable by the "someone", I anonymize the "someone It could be said that I am offering a kind of letter to trigger the

Only then can the message of the work enter someone else's mind. I'm drawing an anonymous existential, wondering if there isn't one, but I'm drawing an anonymous existential.